gutfeeders

Guts and fibre · Parkinson’s and taurine

gutfeeders

Substances your body already knows and that you can buy without a prescription, with the research that sits under them. Taurine, for instance: a registered heart medicine in Japan, a tub on a shelf here.

The consulting room and the kitchen table

A doctor recommends nothing whose evidence is not solid, and there is a great deal to be said for that. It only means that whatever is harmless and not yet firmly shown never comes up in that room — not even when there is nothing against it.

What gets in

Three things at once

A subject missing one of them is interesting, but not for here.

  • Harmless. A wide margin between the dose and the upper limit, a known side-effect profile, and nothing you cannot undo.
  • Indications that it may help. Research that points in a direction — usually animal work and observations in people, enough to suspect something and too little to promise anything.
  • Good for you anyway. A reason to do it that survives the rest of the story coming to nothing.

The threshold a doctor waits for — randomised trials, hard endpoints, enough participants — exists because the harm of advising something too early is greater than the harm of waiting. For someone with a waiting room full of people, that arithmetic holds.

For one person choosing something today, that arithmetic comes out differently. When something is harmless, costs a few euros a month and does you good regardless of your symptoms, the price of “it did nothing” is low enough that waiting adds little.

What is left to do is find out what has actually been measured: what in people, what only in mice, and what nowhere at all.

How I ended up here

My own reason was a gut that for years tolerated fewer and fewer things. I dealt with that by cutting out more and more, which narrowed my diet and not my symptoms. What finally helped was adding something: fibre, in small steps, over about four months.

What stayed with me is not that it worked, but where it had been sitting. Most of it had been in ordinary journals for years, free to read, and nobody was keeping it back. It fell between specialties and it was not firm enough to make anyone responsible for it.

I work these things out with AI alongside, which I mention because it says something about how this comes about. It reads through more studies in an afternoon than I manage in a month, and it asserts, with exactly the same confidence, things that turn out not to be true. So an entry in the reference list shows how far it was traced: in full, or without authors, or described only by what it found.

I have kept digging into the gut because it helped me so much. The second subject here is Parkinson’s, for my uncle, who has it.

For something already safe, cheap and freely available, I would rather not wait for a trial that may never happen. Anyone weighing that the other way round has just as good reasons.

For now that means guts and Parkinson’s. The counter-evidence is usually a paragraph below it.

What this is not. Not medical advice, not a treatment plan, and never something to replace a medicine you already take.

I am not a doctor. I read research and write down what follows from it and where it stops. For symptoms that persist, for a diagnosis, and certainly for any change to your medication, a doctor should be involved — if only because they follow you closely and so notice first whether anything changes.

The articles

All articles